Видео

Feeling bad for science 😢😢😢😢

I think her best brief was when she announced the mine as a point of contention in Dombas

It will be incomplete for centuries.

Zizek is teaching me to get enjoyment from doing bad things.

The Moon gazing Hare gets the software update.

The configuration of matter (atoms) does not make matter conscious. So there is no gene that produces consciousness. Unselfishness is meaningless without consciousness. Given consciousness there may be a gene that makes unselfishness desirable. But, since consciousness is needed for unselfishness to exist, genetics is not the ultimate cause of unselfishness.

The Cosmic Framerate theory which unifies time and reality answers this question.

No, we don't. Fixed that for you.

She's not very good at communicating. Why did she confounded direct democracy to direct vote? Direct democracy means that the individual is actually involved in governing/organizing/work/vote. 4 hours of work, 4 hours for productivity, and do what you want with the rest. I mean, direct voting is just sending a vote to BGT, nobody bats an eye to that!

The punch line is that consciousness is fundamental.

It is lunacy, man can't crack the code so GOD pocesses less intelligence than man. This is when he should shut up and keep searching. Where is the full video?

Capitalism, like many fraudisms coming from the rich and powerful, is not a real thing. Only thing humans have ever done or will ever do is FEUDALISM... Every new government system is just more cover for the same feudalist system that has been and always will be. Why? Humans just don't organize themselves other than through violence. Feudalism is rich people using whatever is available to assault poor people with last generations wealth....

How arrogant is the title of this

The idea that users are somehow investors of big technology companies and are entitled to a share of the profits derived from the use of their services is interesting and raises some fundamental questions concerning data ownership and the digital economy. In the current context, relations between large technology companies and users are usually governed by Terms of Service and privacy policies, which outline the rights and responsibilities of both parties. However, there is a growing interest in alternative business models that allow users to benefit from the collection and use of their personal data. Some ideas and proposals that have been discussed regarding user participation in the profits of technology companies include: Profit-sharing models: Some platforms or services could adopt business models in which a portion of the profits generated from the use of user data is returned directly to the users themselves. This could be achieved through loyalty programmes, remuneration for participation in surveys or sharing of advertising revenue. The idea that users are somehow investors of big technology companies and are entitled to a share of the profits derived from the use of their services is interesting and raises some fundamental questions concerning data ownership and the digital economy. In the current context, relations between large technology companies and users are usually governed by Terms of Service and privacy policies, which outline the rights and responsibilities of both parties. However, there is a growing interest in alternative business models that allow users to benefit from the collection and use of their personal data. Some ideas and proposals that have been discussed regarding user participation in the profits of technology companies include: Profit-sharing models: Some platforms or services could adopt business models in which a portion of the profits generated from the use of user data is returned directly to the users themselves. This could be achieved through loyalty programmes, remuneration for participation in surveys or sharing of advertising revenue. Thanks

Yep aw this coming

You cant have the one/same cat dead and alive at the same time in the one/same dimension/plane/space 🤷🏻‍♀️ But otherwise yeah

Those men look so uncomfortable when a woman is speaking.

Not all actors are rational. Impossible to make a theory that accounts for irrational actors. Thats the 75 % he's talking about. 25% are irrational. Thats scary to think about.

3:05 The way that Zizek rapidly agreed to that statement is hilarious. My man is trying to cover something up

This guy is spitting facts.

Activities without clear motives are more often than not a mechanism of oppression, someone somewhere is benefiting from it at your expense

🦄

yeah ,yep,yeah,yeah,aaah ....there a disturbing need to vocalize the Nothing!

what tell him universe can have bug lack detail without or with god. interesting topic bad result. what tell him universe isnt limted naturaly. good speaker bad argumentm. fail.

You can only experience time in the now, because that is the only time that exist, every other time is a imagintion that doesn't exist other than in the imagination of the person that imaginate it.

The only time that exist everywhere are the now and no other time than the now exist. So all talk about time other than the now is meaningless.

Wacko

Never met the man. Finished reading his memoir in early April. I’ll just say, “Thank goodness”.

But we can't live on the water, can't breathe. Are we a fish?

Sir Penrose made significant contributions to the understanding of black holes and general relativity, for which he was awarded the Nobel Prize. He has been working to solve the final frontier of science: human consciousness. An incredible scientist.

This is sophistry.

Figures don't lie but philosophers figure.

Can society thrive without traditional religious practices? Leave your thoughts in the comments. Watch Rowan Williams debate good and evil with Slavoj Žižek at iai.tv/video/the-end-of-good-and-evil?RUclips&

Are we saying theories are limited . Or are right but only up to a certain point.?

Maybe there is a détector problem when what is used is so large it has to be far away from the collision évent so we rely on the same theories we want to prove to retreive the original particle before decay. I suggested using tiny superconducting filament with hotspot ballistic back in 1986. But as a swiss fellow I was blocked as Switzerland was at the time committed only in the collider technology and not the physics it should lead to

Maybe like for Newton gravitation we need a new Einstein for a new vision. Sorry Sabine

Superb interview. I am fully Darwinian so far but that gave really interesting and new perspective. I will look for more info about it.

“What do you mean by “male bodied”?” He literally asked her that question and was genuinely waiting for her to answer that question… this is where we are, it’s absolutely BONKERS.

Anyone who would have you belive otherwise, is likely harbouring darker intentions. To quote; “The chance that higher life forms might have emerged through evolutionary processes is comparable with the chance that a tornado sweeping through a junk yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the material therein.” - Sir Fred Hoyle. We know evolution works, as dog breeding is a result of that process. They have lifespans, 1/10th the human beings. Regarding chromosome pairs, humans are different enough from Primates, to be a completely separate species.

how far back will Israel go back to justify its domination of Palestine?

When Voldemort talked about Capitalism, you better listen.

Stupid denial . How about US and little Britain’s constant try to not only have spheres of influence, but rule the world? Get lost with your lies and very British demonization of Russia.

IMHO = The thing about observing particles is that you are creating an action and / or a potential decision branch. Which represents a change in direction for the particle. A change in state. Actions / Decisions are what initiate the two or more copies of the particle in the forward future. Step back ( or slow down ) and you’ll change the space time and the potential branch off options available for your particle. Once an action a decision is branched onto, it changes.

I think I evolved the same way...

Humanity and life on Earth is finished not capitalism. Evolution end with us. Hyper-auto-parasitism has always been there, it's the root of occidental culture, social scaled (slave based economics). The mechanism is understandable, but we've setup to fail and we've done it. it can be capitalism or feudalism. Still we've failed our evolution. We've encouraged behavior that we exactly needed to avoid and regulate. Social Darwinism is an aberration and a lie to mask the real dynamic behind. Psychic regression hidden behind primitive behavior that are promoted, called success, bringing power. Federate by our weakness that the strategy of captured economics. Will for imbalance. The belief of social auto-determination is an illusion. This prism is own and shape mostly by media which exploit every bias that feeds it. "What you are will be retain against yourself." That's how all the system work now, deprive anyone as much of autonomy as possible. (auto-nomy, being able to name yourself, to think ysf.) Social Science is applied against people in those system. It's called social engineerings. I don't think there is a way out of extinction now. We've failed so miserably to build any wisdom at any point in time. Occidental culture is an absolute failure. We're the baddies, killing anything else. Peace have no weapon, so this is it. Only way to enforce peace is wisdom, true knowledge, Truth. Truth is a dictatorship but what if it only speak about goodness and freedom. Humanity own all problem on Earth, only us. This is the end, my only friend the end.

Good stuff from Yanis! Laissez-faire or under-controlled capitalism plus under-controlled technological "progress" brings us to technofeudalism (also describable as corporate socialism with economic growth based on continuing tech "progress"). This is the basic life drive operating in the human species without the wisdom of constraints to maintain balance-fairness, human-human, human-earth. Just as, without having basic design rules-constraints, you cannot make an airplane that flies well and efficiently with its passengers safe, happy, and comfortable, neither can you have an economy that flies without the right design rules-constraints. Can we redesign-rebuild the airplane we now have while it’s still flying, or will it need to be brought down? Next Q: What becomes of the nature of man or even our existence as a species under technofeudalism? Borgification or replacement by our own technology.

The “capitalists” are not a class. That narrative is incredibly outdated and potentially dangerous. Rather, capitalism is the basis of our economic systems and it has lifted hundreds of millions out of poverty. Yes, it shouldn’t be unfettered; it requires good, sensible regulation. Regulated capitalism is the right path forward.

The first (/10) Vishnu avatara (incarnation of God) in Hinduism .. was the fish. Matsya

Destiny, truth be told, we are living a co-op surge right now. And this is very cool. PS: Imagine a talk with Zizek and Hideo Kojima